Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan Kota Magelang Berdasarkan Dimensi LibQUAL+TM pada Persepsi Generasi Muda

Authors

  • Kayla Chintya Lee Rahman Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Tidar
  • Abhinaya Hafidzhah Liu Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Tidar
  • Gladys Kirani Adittya Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Tidar
  • Marsya Mutiara Syalwa Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Tidar
  • Bayu Mufa’uzun Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Tidar
  • Joko Tri Nugraha Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61332/antasena.v4i1.537

Keywords:

Library Service Quality, LibQUAL TM, Perception, Young Generation, Library

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of services at the Magelang City Library from the perspective of the younger generation through the application of the LibQUAL+TM approach. The primary focus of this study is to determine how users aged 15 to 24 perceive the quality of library services, which includes aspects such as the Service Affect, the Library as Place, Personal Control, and Informaation Access. To determine respondents who met the study criteria, a descriptive quantitative method using simple random sampling was employed. To measure user satisfaction with library services, a questionnaire was distributed to 110 individuals out of a total of 20,074 users, with a margin of error of 10%. The Likert scale ranged from 1 to 5. The research results indicate that the overall quality of services at the Magelang City Library is considered satisfactory. Library as Place received the highest score because the library’s physical facilities were rated as comfortable, clean, and pleasant, and were able to support reading and learning activities for the younger generation. Additionally, the Service Affect aspect was also rated positively because librarians were perceived as friendly, responsive, communicative, and capable of effectively meeting visitors’ needs. However, the aspects of Personal Control and Information Access continued to show a significant neutral response. Therefore, in the future, libraries must focus on developing digital services, improving the quality of their information collections, providing more modern facilities, and optimizing their information retrieval systems.

References

Applegate, R. (1997). Models of user satisfaction: Understanding false positives. Rethinking Reference, 36(1), 1–13.

Asemi, A., & Riyahiniya, N. (2007). Awareness and use of digital resources in the libraries of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The Electronic Library, 25(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710754805

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Standards for college libraries. American Library Association.

Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Users’ hierarchical perspectives on library service quality: A LibQUAL+TM study. College & Research Libraries, 62(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.2.147

Emiri, O. T. (2015). Evaluation of library service quality using LibQUAL+ in a Nigerian academic library. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–15.

Fatmawati. (2013). Kualitas layanan perpustakaan: Studi berbasis LibQUAL. Graha Ilmu.

Fitriyani, F. (2020). Persepsi pemustaka remaja terhadap kualitas layanan perpustakaan dengan metode LibQUAL+TM. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga.

Hernon, P., & Altman, E. (2010). Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of library customers (2nd ed.). American Library Association.

Hiller, S. (2001). Assessing user needs, satisfaction, and library performance at the University of Washington Libraries. Library Trends, 49(4), 605–625.

Kiran, K. (2010). Service quality and customer satisfaction in academic libraries: Perspectives from a Malaysian university. Library Review, 59(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531011038578

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(2), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566690910971445

Mohiuddin, G., & Su, J. (2013). Use of LibQUAL+TM to assess service quality in academic libraries: A case study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 14(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041311313685

Nitecki, D. A. (1996). Changing the concept and measure of service quality in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90056-7

Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place. Marlowe & Company.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Rahayuningsih. (2015). Manajemen perpustakaan. Graha Ilmu.

Rastati, R. (2018). Media literasi bagi generasi Z. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 20(1), 60–72.

Rowley, J. (1996). Measuring quality in libraries. Library Management, 17(5), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129610113541

Sarwono, S. W. (2016). Psikologi remaja (Rev. ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2007 tentang Perpustakaan.

Walgito, B. (2010). Pengantar psikologi umum (Edisi revisi). Andi Offset.

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Rahman, K. C. L. ., Liu, A. H. ., Adittya, G. K. ., Syalwa, M. M. ., Mufa’uzun, B. ., & Nugraha, J. T. . (2026). Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan Kota Magelang Berdasarkan Dimensi LibQUAL+TM pada Persepsi Generasi Muda. ANTASENA: Governance and Innovation Journal, 4(1), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.61332/antasena.v4i1.537

Issue

Section

Articles