Peran Intelijen Melalui Perumusan Kebijakan Pertahanan Negara dalam Perang Hibrida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61332/ijpa.v7i1.152Keywords:
hybrid warfare, intelligence, national defense policyAbstract
Hybrid warfare, with its blend of conventional military tactics, irregular warfare, cyber attacks, and information operations, presents complex challenges to national security. The role of intelligence in understanding, countering, and formulating effective defense policies in hybrid warfare contexts is crucial. This qualitative research study examines the multifaceted role of intelligence in addressing hybrid warfare threats and shaping national defense policies. Utilizing secondary data sources, including government reports, academic publications, and policy analyses, the study employs thematic analysis to explore three key areas: (1) the role of intelligence in understanding and countering hybrid warfare threats; (2) integrating intelligence insights into formulating national defense policies to address hybrid threats; and (3) challenges in employing intelligence-led defense policies in hybrid warfare contexts. Findings highlight the significance of intelligence in providing situational awareness, informing policy decisions, and mitigating risks in hybrid warfare scenarios. The study ends by stressing how important it is for leaders to be able to adapt, for institutions to work together, and for ethical concerns to be taken into account when improving intelligence capabilities and making the best use of them to deal with the changing challenges of hybrid warfare.
References
Aftergood, S. (2007). The Rise of Intelligence Fusion Centers . FAS. https://fas.org/publication/the_rise_of_intelligence_fusio/
Arquilla, J. (1996). The advent of netwar. Rand Corporation.
Barry, J. A., Davis, J., Gries, D. D., & Sullivan, J. (1994). Bridging the Intelligence-Policy Divide.
Bilal, A. (2021). Hybrid Warfare–New Threats, Complexity, and ‘Trust’as the Antidote. Nato Review, 30.
BJA. (2013). National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan Building a National Capability for Effective Criminal Intelligence Development and the Nationwide Sharing of Intelligence and Information.
Connell, M., & Vogler, S. (2017). Strategic Communication in Hybrid Warfare. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 1(2), 58–83.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Dalton, M. (2020). Partners, Not Proxies: Capacity Building in Hybrid Warfare. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.csis.org/analysis/partners-not-proxies-capacity-building-hybrid-warfare
Garamone, J. (2019). Military Must Be Ready to Confront Hybrid Threats, Intel Official Says. US Department of Defense, Accessed February, 19.
George, R. Z., & Kline, R. D. (2006). Intelligence and the national security strategist: enduring issues and challenges. Rowman & Littlefield.
Heifetz, R. A., & Laurie, D. L. (2001). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 79(11).
Hoffman, F. G. (2009). Hybrid Warfare and Challenges. https://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/jfqhoffman.pdf
Hoffman, F. G. (2014). Hybrid warfare and challenges. In Strategic Studies (pp. 329-337). Routledge.
Hoffman, F. G. (2016). Chapter 3 | U.S. Defense Policy and Strategy. National Defense University Press.
Hunter, E., & Pernik, P. (2015). The challenges of hybrid warfare. International Centre for Defence and Security Tallinn.
Iancu, N., Fortuna, A., & Barna, C. (2016). Countering hybrid threats: lessons learned from Ukraine (Vol. 128). IOS Press.
Johnson, L. K., & Wirtz, J. J. (2011). Intelligence: The secret world of spies: An anthology. (No Title).
Rivai Ras, A., Widiawan, B., Josias Simon, A., & Rivai, A. (2020). Pemodelan Sistem Dinamis Stratejik Intelijen Dalam Meminimalisasi Ancaman Spionase dan Pencurian Privasi Big Data Di Era Industri 4.0. In Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional (Vol. 3, Issue 2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jksknAvailableat:https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jkskn/vol3/iss2/6
Katz, B. (2020). Intelligence Edge: Opportunities and Challenges from Emerging Technologies for US Intelligence. https://www.csis.org/analysis/intelligence-edge-opportunities-and-challenges-emerging-technologies-us-intelligence
Kupcikas, K. (2013). The importance of intelligence to international security. 8.
Lasconjarias, G., & Larsen, J. A. (2015). NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats. NATO Defense College, Research Division.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2008). The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 16, 121–142.
Monaghan, S. (2019). Countering Hybrid Warfare: So What for the Future Joint Force? Prism, 8(2), 82–99.
NATO. (2021, June 21). What is NATO doing to address hybrid threats? https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_183004.htm
ODNI. (2019). What is Intelligence? https://www.dni.gov/index.php/what-we-do/what-is-intelligence
ODNI. (2023). 2023 National Intelligence Strategy.
Peterson, M. (2005). Intelligence-Led Policing: The New Intelligence Architecture. www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
Pillar, P. R. (2011). Intelligence and US foreign policy: Iraq, 9/11, and misguided reform. Columbia University Press.
Sarjito, A. (2022). Perang Hibrida: Perang Generasi Keempat. Manajemen Pertahanan: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Manajemen Pertahanan, 8(1).
Sarjito, A. (2023). Integrating the Concept of Situational Leadership and VUCA in Formulating Adaptive and Responsive Defense Policies. Journal of Social Interactions and Humanities, 2(3), 221–238.
Sarjito, I. A., Duarte, E. P., & Sos, S. (2023). Geopolitik dan Geostrategi Pertahanan: Tantangan Keamanan Global. Indonesia Emas Group.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Smith, H. (2019). Countering hybrid threats. Democracy, 95(2), 255–277.
Solmaz, T. (2022). Hybrid Warfare’One Term, Many. Small Wars Journal, 25.
Spall, A. (2019). Improving Information Sharing: Local Fusion Centers and Their Improving Information Sharing: Local Fusion Centers and Their Role in the Intelligence Cycle Role in the Intelligence Cycle. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/homelandsecurity
Stokes, R. L., Kiernan, K., & Rollins, J. (2013). NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA.
Taddeo, M., McNeish, D., Blanchard, A., & Edgar, E. (2021). Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence in National Defence. Philosophy and Technology, 34(4), 1707–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00482-3
Treverton, G. F. (2009). Intelligence for an Age of Terror. Cambridge University Press.
Warner, M. (2004). The Role of Intelligence in World War II: Lessons for the Twenty-First Century. Georgetown University Press.
Winner, L. (2017). Do artifacts have politics? In Computer ethics (pp. 177–192). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aris Sarjito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
