Menafsir Ulang Independensi Pers Dalam Perspektif Etika Media: Studi Literatur Atas Pemberitaan Politik Tempo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61332/ijpa.v9i1.442Keywords:
Press Independence, Media Ethics, Political Reporting, Critical Journalism, TempoAbstract
Press independence is a fundamental principle in the practice of democratic journalism, particularly in political reporting, which is full of interests and power relations. However, in practice, press independence not only faces political pressure but is also influenced by the economic structure of the media and the dynamics of journalistic ethics. This article aims to reinterpret the concept of press independence within the framework of media ethics through a literature review of political reporting practices, focusing on Tempo as a representation of critical journalism in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method, analyzing various academic sources, press regulations, and previous studies relevant to press independence, media ethics, and political reporting. The study results show that press independence cannot be understood as an absolute condition free from influence, but rather as an ethical practice that is dynamic and contextual. Tempo showing a form of ethical independence through the courage to take a critical stance based on facts and public interest, even under the pressure of economic and political media structures. Thus, press independence in political reporting is more accurately understood as the result of ongoing negotiation between the normative principles of journalism, media ethics, and the structural realities of the press industry. This study is expected to enrich academic discourse on media ethics and press independence in Indonesia.
References
Haqqullah, W. M, & Safira, U (2025). Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Terhadap Independensi Kebebasan Pers Pada Kasus Jurnalis Tempo. Journal of Constitutional Law and Governance. 5(1), 17-37.
Santoso, E (2021). Independensi Media Tempo Dan Pengaruh Ekonomi Politik Dalam Praktik Strukturasi. Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi. 6(1), 24-38.
Harahap, A. M., & Adeni, S (2025). Journalism Ethic In Online Media In Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. 8, 6522-6526.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170.
Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.
Musfialdy. (2019). Independensi media: Pro-kontra objektivitas dan netralitas pemberitaan media. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 2(1), 45–58.
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the twenty-first century. Monthly Review Press.
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.
Dewan Pers. (2018). Kode etik jurnalistik. Dewan Pers Republik Indonesia.
Ward, S. J. A. (2010). Global journalism ethics. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lena Lapina, Achmad Nashrudin Priatna, Della Meira, Siti Abelia Puteri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














